For a one-page summary, download the tearsheet: https://www.partnerintelligence.now/partners/endava-uk-ltd/tearsheet
London, London, United Kingdom4.5 / 5 CSAT
RegisteredC&I
SelectService ProviderEndava are reimagining the relationship between people and technology
Synced Source: ServiceNow Partner FinderMethodology
Key figures for Endava (UK) Limited, who they are and how ServiceNow scores them.
Endava are reimagining the relationship between people and technology
ServiceNow does not publish how the Partner Score is computed; it may include signals that are not public, such as revenue or internal performance data. We show it as published. How we use it
What Endava (UK) Limited is assessed and certified on: product lines, architects, accreditations and certifications.
No product line achievements yet. They appear here once ServiceNow publishes them for this partner.


How Endava (UK) Limited compares with partners in the same program and tier.
Below median · Median 93 · Best 158 · 41/41 peers
Below median · Median 28 · Best 201 · 41/41 peers
At the peer median · Median 0 · Best 12 · 41/41 peers
Sign in to see every benchmark, including Validated Practices, CSAT, architects and accreditations.
How Endava (UK) Limited has moved: tier journey, Partner Score and every tracked figure month by month.
Registered → Global Elite
| Figure | May 2026 | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Since Nov 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner Score | 46+15 | 46 | 46 | 48+1 | 48 | 48 | +5 |
| Unique CIS-Certified Resources | 22−1 | 25+3 | 24−1 | 23−1 | 24+1 | 24 | +4 |
| Certified Technical Architects | 2+1 | 2 | 1−1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 |
| Customer satisfaction (CSAT) | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 0 |
No ServiceNow partner awards on record.
What Endava (UK) Limited has built on the platform and how to reach them.
No offerings, solutions, integrations or Store apps on ServiceNow's listing for this partner.
Consulting & Implementation
Service Provider
P = percentile among Service Provider Select peers (41 partners); higher is better